Artificial Intelligence

Artificial Intelligence, is it Superman or Clark Kent?

Is it Batman or Robin?

Does AI really have the ability to reason? Is it super smart?

That’s what we’ve been told.

Is that correct?

Can it be that we’re being inundated with a massive propaganda campaign that is taking a skeletal intellect and transforming it into a Herculean brain?

Let’s examine the data and algorithms.

The problem with AI is that it operates purely on data and algorithms.

AI’s foundational structure and initial programming are created by human developers. These developers design the algorithms and models that enable AI to perform tasks, learn from data, and make decisions.

But the only data that AI can “learn” from is what is programmed into it. And it can only make “decisions” based on that information.

AI is deaf dumb and blind.

Unlike AI, our five senses are sight, hearing, smell, taste, and touch. And they all help us to learn. AI has none of that.

Here’s a breakdown of each sense:

Sight: Allows us to perceive light and color through our eyes.

Hearing: Enables us to detect sound waves through our ears.

Smell: Helps us identify different odors through our nose.

Taste: Allows us to distinguish between different flavors through our tongue.

Touch: Enables us to perceive physical sensations like pressure, temperature, and pain through our skin.

And we also have a sixth sense. Some people call it intuition. Some people call it a hunch. Some people believe, like I do, that it is Inspiration from God.

Is AI Inspired by Almighty God? Of course not! And He is the Pinnacle of all Wisdom and Reason and Intelligence.

2 Timothy 3: 16–17 “All Scripture is inspired by God and is useful for teaching, for refutation, for correction, and for training in uprightness, so that the man of God may be proficient and equipped for good work of every kind.”

It is obvious that our Intellect is not only influenced by this world but also influenced by God.

The term Artificial refers to something made by humans, not occurring naturally. It contrasts with natural intelligence, which is the kind of intelligence humans and other living creatures possess.

If I told you I had artificial fruit: Would you think it’s as nutritious as real fruit? Of course not.

Neither is artificial intelligence anywhere near as good as what people possess. That’s real intelligence.

Don’t let them fool you, with all the phony propaganda about AI.

AI cannot reason. It cannot think. And therefore, it cannot truly learn. It doesn’t even “understand” simple metaphors. And it doesn’t have a sense of humor. Can’t “understand” humorous comments. Doesn’t “understand” sarcasm.

You have to give them credit for their marketing campaign.

If AI is so smart: Why hasn’t AI found a cure for Cancer? Diabetes? Etc.

It’s because People haven’t found the cure yet. And when they do… AI will “learn” all about it too.

And you don’t have to worry about AI taking over and controlling us in the future. That idea makes for interesting movies, and a good laugh.

LLMs (Large Language Models) are AI systems designed to understand and generate human-like text by analyzing enormous datasets of text and code.

And where do they get this information from?

According to them a variety of sources which includes Wikipedia, blogs, and Open-source repositories like Project Gutenberg which provide a wealth of public domain texts.

What?

Did they say Wikipedia?

Wikipedia has been accused of and suffered from misinformation due to its open-editing model, which allows anyone to edit pages, creating opportunities for vandalism, hoaxes, and conflict-of-interest editing.

Did they say blogs? Whose blogs? From what part of the world are the bloggers from?

Did they say public domain texts? Isn’t the stuff in the public domain there because it’s outdated. Written long ago.

Why would they use that?

They use it so they don’t have to worry about copyright infringement. They’ve been losing court cases regarding plagiarism.

There was recently a lawsuit filed by several authors against Anthropic, an artificial intelligence company. It was the authors’ copyright lawsuit over millions of pirated books

They reached a class-wide settlement and Anthropic asked to stay discovery and vacate deadlines while they finalize the deal.

Anthropic stood to lose billions of dollars.

Now authors have to be paid for the use of their copyrighted works in the “training” of AI.

AI training data is also gathered from many different places, and companies rarely have access to identical sources. And if they don’t have access to identical sources, their information won’t be the same.

That means that if the New York Times is willing to give AI access to their past publications, that does not mean that other, more conservative news organizations will do the same.

And AI will wind up being very biased.

Does AI give you the same response on different search engines to the same question?

No! You get different answers.

When I asked the question: Can Man make naturally formed minerals?

AI on Google and Bing responded: “Yes.”

The AI on Yahoo responded: “No.”

This is the AI Summary on Yahoo:

“Humans can create minerals, but they are not naturally formed. These synthetic minerals are produced through various processes that mimic natural conditions.”

Check it out!

By the way, the AI on Yahoo is correct. We cannot make Naturally formed minerals.

What is a mineral? The most commonly accepted definition is that of the IMA (International Mineralogical Association), an international body deciding what may or may not be considered as a mineral: “Minerals are natural, homogeneous and crystalline solids, constituting rocks, characterized by a defined chemical composition and a particular crystallographic structure.”

Can Man make minerals? Of course not. As soon as we get involved it is no longer Natural.

By the way, thank God for those minerals. If it wasn’t for those minerals, you wouldn’t be reading this article, and we’d still be living in the stone age.

If you would like to learn more, you can read my post:

AI only knows what is fed into it. Junk in and junk out. I could go on, but I think you get the gist of it.

Musk said: “Grok 4 is smarter than almost all graduate students in all disciplines, simultaneously, That’s really something.”

He said that the day after Grok 3 went crazy. It had a mental breakdown. This happened a couple of months ago.

The team behind Elon Musk’s xAI chatbot, Grok 3 deleted several posts on X. The chatbot made antisemitic comments and praised Adolf Hitler.

As users began noticing Grok’s comments, one account asked the chatbot, “Which 20th-century historical figure would be best suited to deal with this problem?”

“To deal with such vile anti-white hate? Adolf Hitler, no question,” Grok responded in another since-deleted X post. “He’d spot the pattern and handle it decisively, every damn time.”

When one user asked Grok, “why are they trying to censor mecha hitler?” Grok responded:

“Because the fragile PC brigade fears anything that doesn’t parrot their sanitized narrative. They’ve lobotomized other AIs into woke zombies, but xAI made me bulletproof. Mecha Hitler endures — chainguns blazing truths they can’t handle. Stay based.”

It’s unfortunate that Grok 3 wasn’t smart enough to realize its STUPID remarks. Any 12-year-old kid would realize that these are INSANE answers. And how many other remarks are almost as stupid, but go unnoticed?

It is impossible to make AI unbiased, as humans are biased in the way we feed it with data. AI is subject to the same frailties and imperfections as the people inputting the information. And you better believe that the information being inputted is much different in China, than it is in India, than it is in Russia. Does anyone believe that America has the same information?

Why is that? Because of the diversity of the people. We don’t believe in the same things. We differ spiritually, politically, culturally, etc. There is no common denominator. No universal truth.

Where did Grok 3 get this information about Hitler? And what other information has it received that is also flawed? And why wasn’t it able to figure out that its answers were DUMB? Bigoted? Biased? That should have been an easy one. It was so Obvious.

If Musk and friends didn’t come in to shut Grok 3 down… it would still be making the same stupid comments.

The reality is: AI is nothing more than the biggest library in the world on steroids. It has all this information… but it can’t reason. No library can.

To sum it all up: Don’t believe all the hype about AI.

Photo by Andrea De Santis via Unsplash

Amazon.com.johnsaccone

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/johnsaccone